Happiness, it seems to me, is both
more difficult and easier to attain in the modern age.
As educated people, Americans and
Europeans are expected to know all the 'basics' ... such as the fact that money
can't/doesn't buy you happiness. And yet survey after survey seem to point to
the fact that people in less developed nations such as India tend to be happier.
What gives? I think the difference
lies in what one's life goals are, what one is striving for, what one chooses
to measure one's life by. The 'BIG' "Meaning of Life" question.
We take our cues from our parents,
family, society, surroundings, and so on. The horizons of someone who lives in
a village in India or China is limited. He/She sees folks grow up, pursue the
same activities as his or her parents, then get married and have kids and
slowly grow old. The cycle of life tends to repeat itself. The 'desires' tend
to be basic and simple and easily obtained. Hence, happiness and contentment
are easy to attain.
The modern world has turned
everything into a mess. We are bombarded with endless information, endless
temptations, endless possibilities. We do not know where to draw the limit. For
the new middle class in India, buying a small car costing $8,000 may be a major
life achievement leading to much contentment and wide celebration. For
Americans, a $30,000 sedan may be a 'basic necessity' rather than a luxury.
How 'big' a house is enough? 500 sq.
ft.? 1,500 sq. ft.? At least a 3-bedroom suburban home with a garden and picket
fences?
What about traveling the world and
vacationing and honeymoons? How many kids must one contribute to the family and
to the world?
The 'items' mentioned above are
already more than enough to keep most men and women busy through their lives.
And I have not even talked about the multitude of choices we are faced with
that makes compatibility less likely.
One of the key factors that impacts
how happy or otherwise we are in life has to do with the relationships we have
in our lives. In traditional societies, there really is not much of a choice.
These relationships are automatically decided for you before you are born. You
live in the house that your forefathers have built and till the land that
belongs to the forefathers. You spend entire lifetimes with your parents and
probably live to see your own kids grow up and have their own kids in turn.
This is not necessarily an endearing prospect.
People in developed nations have
managed to get out of this vicious circle. They leave home pretty much
permanently when they leave for college. They choose their own life partners.
And those 'life' partners do not even have to be for life. This is all good.
It's my conviction that with the proliferation of choices we have, it is going
to be more and more difficult to find a 'partner' who is exactly like us. This
already leads to much heartburn and will continue to do so in the future.
Just consider the possibilities for
differences —>>
what food one likes: veg, non-veg,
Mexican, Thai, Sushi, Indian
what TV shows one likes: Game of
Thrones, Breaking Bad, Sopranos, Seinfeld, Jon Stewart, Bill Maher, Stephen
Colbert, The Office, Girls, and so on till infinity
what is one's chosen favorite way of
relaxation: working out, cycling, boxing, sleeping till noon, reading a book,
tweeting
what is one's attitude towards
technology: always connected, tweets from the loo, Apple-fanatic, Linux-head,
technophobe
car crazy or a believer in public
transport, lover of nature and a warrior for the environment, watches what one
eats, cleanliness-freak, etc. etc.
So the choices are endless. As the
letters that pour in to advice columnists show, folks are facing many and
varied and unprecedented relationship issues which of course explains the
proliferation of gurus not the least of whom is Deepak Chopra.
Here's wishing that we will realize
that there ARE no lessons to learn; that there is no BIG "Meaning of Life"
as such; that if we enjoy reading fiction or non-fiction or enjoy cooking, then
that IS the meaning. That IS enough.
I can do no better than to conclude
with my favorite words which capture my philosophy of life exquisitely and
perfectly:
"There are no lessons to be
learnt, no discoveries to be made, no solutions to offer. I find myself left
with nothing but a few random thoughts. One of them is that from up here I can
look back and see that although a human life is less than the blink of an
eyelid in terms of the universe, within its own framework it is amazingly
capacious so that it can contain many opposites. One life can contain serenity
and tumult, heartbreak and happiness, coldness and warmth, grabbing and giving
— and also more particular opposites such as a neurotic conviction that one is
a flop and a consciousness of success amounting to smugness." — Diana
Athill
Comments
Post a Comment
Feel free to weigh in with your thoughts ...