Skip to main content

Modi Versus Rahul


Mr. Rahul Gandhi, let's face it, is your usual average, run-of-the-mill spoiled brat, rich kid, etc.

The kind of guy who typically tend to spend their lives splurging their father's money, like, Sidhartha Mallaya.

They usually are to be found in bars everywhere from Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore to London, Madrid, New York City, and elsewhere.

When they get unlucky, they crash their Ferraris or BMWs or Lamborghinis -- and make it to the papers.

It's the tragedy of India that we should be debating whether he deserves to be the PM.

The alternative: Narendra Modi.



He is apparently running a non-corrupt administration in Gujarat and with the help of the entrepreneurial people of the state, he is leading it and helping its people prosper.

Whatever media profiles there are of him, show him to be a bit of an autocrat -- not given to liking criticism.

The problem arises when people develop a liking for Hitler.

Why is it the tragic fate of India to have to choose between these two men?

Why do we think we need a strong man at the top to run a country?

Aren't systems more important?

Didn't Narayana Murthy say we need good people in business, in politics, in administration?

Are the senior bureaucrats running the day-to-day stuff such unruly kids that they are wont to go berserk if they don't have a non-corrupt and strict boss like Modi?

Is Modi going to run Government of India all by himself? Or will he need ministers too? Manmohan Singh surely is not in to make money though he has proved that he is more unsuited to the job than Aishwarya Rai.

I can think of other chief ministers in less developed states of India who also have a record of non-corrupt governance.

I have in mind Nitish Kumar in Bihar or Naveen Patnaik in Odisha.

But you could always point to the past of Nitish Kumar as a former close lieutenant of Laloo Yadav. And Mr. Patnaik is the CM because he is the son of Biju Patnaik.

I think the people of Gujarat deserve more recognition for the hard work they've ALWAYS done. The Patels apparently run 70% of the motels in America.

But we do not need India to be run by Gujaratis.

People of India will swim or sink depending on their choices. We need not depend and cannot afford to depend on individual personalities.

We have to stop hoping for miracles of the type shown in the movie Nayak. We have to put in place better systems where everyone gets a fair shot.

Let's hope people will wise up about the charlatans who claim about how rich India is.

India has been poor for a long time. People are lazy. People get applauded in our society for having three kids instead of being excoriated.

People of India want to get a degree, then a job and then get on to the important task of having three kids. Americans and Europeans and the Japanese think of conquering the world or changing the world.

Indians have to have bigger dreams, larger appetites -- and not just in terms of food.


Twitter: @sachi_bbsr

Popular posts from this blog

Sarah Kay's poem from TED

If I should have a daughter, instead of mom, she's going to call me Point B,

because that way she knows that no matter what happens, at least she can always find her way  to me.
And I am going to paint the Solar Systems on the backs of her hands, so she has to learn the entire universe before she can say 'Oh, I know that like the back of my hand'
And she's going to learn that this life will hit you, hard, in the face, wait for you to get back up, just so we can kick you in the stomach but getting the wind knocked out of you is the only way to remind your lungs how much they like the taste of air.

Top 10 Crazy Facts About India

Here's a random list of things. 1.Indians sometimes prefer to abort a fetus if they find out that it's female. (Or they just kill the new born baby after it's born.) 2.There are more than 20 million babies born in India. EVERY. SINGLE. YEAR. 3.Child labor is so commonplace in India that few notice it or consider it out of the ordinary. Kids work as waiters or dishwashers in roadside restaurants. Sometimes, kids ferry tea to the local police station from a nearby roadside tea stall. 4.Massive numbers of kids and younger and adult women are employed as maids in middle class to rich households. Middle class houses might pay 200 rupees to a female who comes and washes the dishes. Rich houses might employ women permanently by paying them more. 5.Cars in the Indian cities are washed in the morning by car-washers who tend to be young men who get paid around 100 to 200 rupees per month for this service. 6.India is home to some crazily competitive exams. The IIT JEE and the IIM CAT have …

Edward Snowden

This seems to me to be the defining journalism-whistle-blower story of this generation. It's rare in today's world when privileged people voluntarily choose to take steps whereby they give up comfortable lives to do something that is in the 'public good.' Mr. Snowden was clearly a computer whiz which explains why he got jobs at the CIA (including postings in Geneva under diplomatic cover). Booz Allen obviously did not hire him or pay him the $1,20,000 salary without Mr. Snowden showcasing some considerable technical expertise. I believe Mr. Snowden's expertise probably lies in having deep expertise in various flavors of Linux. That is what I am inclined to infer from his various job roles as a 'Systems Engineer' or 'System Administrator.' Being the self-driven sort of person that he was, I am sure he must be having good knowledge about networking and encryption stuff including but not limited to Cisco routers and related technologies. To put these t…