Skip to main content

Shooting Incident on Mars

On the same day that the Mars Science Laboratory Curiosity landed on Mars after a nail-biting Entry, Descent, and Landing sequence, there are now reports of a shooting incident involving two rovers.

The mission managers in JPL, CalTech issued a terse press release which simply said: "There has been a shooting incident involving our rovers on Mars."

This has confounded the American public who did not even know that the rovers were equipped with guns in the first place.

Sources inside JPL have given some hints as to how this might have happened. The sources say the rovers are equipped with guns which they are programmed to use for 'self defense' in case of appropriate emergencies. The software inside the 'brains' of the rovers has algorithms which try to identify any Little Green Men nearby and if any creatures resembling the LGM are detected by the rovers, they are authorized to shoot at the LGM in self-defense. The rovers are allowed to take this decision autonomously without referring to mission control in Pasadena as the signal from Mars to Earth can take anywhere between 15 to 30 minutes to travel. The rovers might be endangered in the time interval it takes for managers back on Earth to take a look at any SOS signals sent by the rovers and send the appropriate commands back to the rovers to respond with.


Some experts are hypothesizing that Curiosity landed in close proximity to the existing Opportunity rover. The smaller Opportunity rover's brain was rather surprised at the sudden appearance of this new flying vehicle in the otherwise quiet Martian afternoon sky. The sky crane maneuver with the retro rockets flying made the Opportunity rover mistake Curiosity's landing to aliens landing.

When Curiosity raised its Mast, the resemblance between it and LGM became so overwhelming that Opportunity concluded that it had finally come across LGM. Instead of a cautious course of action such as sending the images back to Earth for further analysis and guidance about further actions, Opportunity decided to be pro-active.

It pulled the gun stored safely inside its belly and pointed it precisely in the direction of Curiosity with the help of lasers.

When Curiosity felt a laser focusing on it, it swerved in the direction of Opportunity and detected that Opportunity had a gun in its hand. Then Curiosity brought out its own gun in self-defense too.

Shots were exchanged between the rovers. In the meantime the rovers also sent signals to each other which made them realize that they were 'friendlies.' Then they stopped shooting  at each other. Experts on Earth at this time are busy checking what and how much damage occurred to the rovers in this incident.

Prob gun lobby guys have meanwhile defended the right of the rovers to bear arms for self-defense. A spokesperson for NRA said: "Imagine what would happen if real LGM were to confront the rovers. With their guns with them, the rovers at least have a fighting chance to fight with the LGM."

Opponents of the gun lobby have however strongly deplored NASA's decision to equip rovers with guns. A spokesperson for No Guns In Space said: "This incident quite clearly demonstrates the dangers of having guns in space. Even as we speak, we do not yet know if this senseless shooting incident may have fatally crippled instruments that cost the taxpayers billions of dollars to build, send, and deploy on Mars."

Justice Alito was seen on his home computer compiling a 50-page ruling which argued from an anthropomorphic standpoint why he thought rovers were people.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Longforms and 'Best of 2017' Lists and Favorite Books by Ashutosh Joglekar and Scott Aaronson

Ashutosh Joglekar's books list. http://wavefunction.fieldofscience.com/2018/03/30-favorite-books.html Scott Aaronson' list https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3679 https://www.wired.com/story/most-read-wired-magazine-stories-2017/ https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/12/the-best-books-we-read-in-2017/548912/ https://longreads.com/2017/12/21/longreads-best-of-2017-essays/ https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/21/world/asia/how-the-rohingya-escaped.html https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-journalists-covered-rise-mussolini-hitler-180961407/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/artificial-intelligence-future-scenarios-180968403/ https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1997/01/20/citizen-kay https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/where-we-are-hunt-cancer-vaccine-180968391/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/dna-based-attack-against-cancer-may-work-180968407/ https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/12/22/dona...

Articles Collection August

Hope to get around to reading or finishing these articles. Some day. When David Remnick writes about Russia, you gotta read. All of David Remnick's articles in the New Yorker. All of Ken Auletta's articles in the New Yorker. Profile of cricket boss N. Srinivasan in The Caravan. Excerpt from Lena Dunham's book. Yes, I for one think it's wrong to teach children to believe in God. It's child abuse. Plain and simple. Philip Seymour Hoffman's last days . Where do children's earliest memories go? Does humanity's future lie among the stars or is our fate extinction ? Chapter 1 of Sam Harris' Waking Up . Finding the words , an elegy. Eight days, the battle to save the American financial system . Love stories from the New Yorker. Profiles from the New Yorker. 25 articles from the New Yorker chosen by Longreads . The Biden agenda from the New Yorker. Kim Philby by Malcolm Gladwell in the New Yorker. Miles O'Brien's PBS story about the ...

Ayn Rand Was Right

Do we exalt the John Galts and Howard Roarks among us or despise them? Do we admire the ultimate, self-centered and selfish capitalists or the selfless, self-sacrificing altruists? Oh sure there are the Martin Luther King, Jr.s and Mahatma Gandhis and Nelson Mandelas and Aung Sun Suu Kyis we like to point to as icons and worthy role models for our children. But look deeply and we find that we are obsessed with the wealthy. And who are the wealthy? Why do we let the Robert Rubins, Sandy Weills, Jakc Welchs, Jamie Dimons and their Wall St. brethren keep their millions? Because we consider that right and their right. Let alone the hedge fund people whose entire purpose is to become billionaires. How many people explicitly make life choices that will lead to a life of service -> not be a charlatan like Mother Teresa but just helping the underprivileged without trying to 'achieve' greatness by so doing. So Lance Armstrong and Greg Mortensen and the Evangelical Christ...