Skip to main content

Day Dreaming about Goldman Sachs

I wonder when and if Congress can pass a law to simply liquidate Goldman Sachs.
What would be the consequences? Not many direct job losses, to be sure. Millions of people have already lost jobs and nobody bothers too much about that or them. There will be a lot of 'collateral' damage for sure. Overall, the size of the financial sector in the economy will shrink.

Is that a bad thing? Youngsters might not dream about becoming millionaires by getting MBAs or law degrees. Instead, bright people might choose to do science which will benefit mankind. Money lures all — or, at least most of us. So, as long as 'legal' avenues are available to make lots of it, youngsters will choose to pursue that career.

In India, engineers suddenly metamorphose into MBAs. IITs' loss is Goldman's gain. I don't know how much of that happens in the U.S.

What if what is happening in Greece were to take place in the U.S.? Who will come to bail the U.S. out? China? India? Europe?

Will people learn to wind down risky financial behavior and voluntarily walk away from the financial cliff beyond which might lie a painful free fall? Or, will it take a double dose of financial pain before people come to this conclusion?

I think people will avoid self-inflicted pain at all costs — no matter how minor or minuscule that pain might be. So, people won't voluntarily forgo a lifestyle that perhaps endangers the climate balance in some manner.

Of course, when pain becomes unavoidable, human beings show remarkable resilience and flexibility and so they will again in the future. The catastrophe might be a climate one or a financial one.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Longforms and 'Best of 2017' Lists and Favorite Books by Ashutosh Joglekar and Scott Aaronson

Ashutosh Joglekar's books list. http://wavefunction.fieldofscience.com/2018/03/30-favorite-books.html Scott Aaronson' list https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3679 https://www.wired.com/story/most-read-wired-magazine-stories-2017/ https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/12/the-best-books-we-read-in-2017/548912/ https://longreads.com/2017/12/21/longreads-best-of-2017-essays/ https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/21/world/asia/how-the-rohingya-escaped.html https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-journalists-covered-rise-mussolini-hitler-180961407/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/artificial-intelligence-future-scenarios-180968403/ https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1997/01/20/citizen-kay https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/where-we-are-hunt-cancer-vaccine-180968391/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/dna-based-attack-against-cancer-may-work-180968407/ https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/12/22/dona...

Why Do We Have A Name?

Humans across religious, cultural and national differences all have names. At least all modern humans have this. I wonder if the lost tribes in the Amazon jungle or the tribes who live in the Nicobar Islands cut off from civilization since the last many thousands of years have a similar naming convention as the rest of us humans do. And we humans often choose to have system of naming that consists of a first name and a last name. the last name often indicates a person’s or a family’s occupation and remains the same from generation to generation. All the offspring of one family get the same last name as the parents — usually the last name of the father. In some cultures, the first names can be the same as that of the father too. In some cultures, the name of the village, and other names too get added to the child’s name and it grows rather long. But consider for a moment how it all would have started and taken hold among humans in deep antiquity. Humans would have acquired...

Ayn Rand Was Right

Do we exalt the John Galts and Howard Roarks among us or despise them? Do we admire the ultimate, self-centered and selfish capitalists or the selfless, self-sacrificing altruists? Oh sure there are the Martin Luther King, Jr.s and Mahatma Gandhis and Nelson Mandelas and Aung Sun Suu Kyis we like to point to as icons and worthy role models for our children. But look deeply and we find that we are obsessed with the wealthy. And who are the wealthy? Why do we let the Robert Rubins, Sandy Weills, Jakc Welchs, Jamie Dimons and their Wall St. brethren keep their millions? Because we consider that right and their right. Let alone the hedge fund people whose entire purpose is to become billionaires. How many people explicitly make life choices that will lead to a life of service -> not be a charlatan like Mother Teresa but just helping the underprivileged without trying to 'achieve' greatness by so doing. So Lance Armstrong and Greg Mortensen and the Evangelical Christ...