Skip to main content

'Rajneeti' is about us

So, let’s not get smug about how politicians are ‘of course’ all dirty like depicted in the movie.

That’s what I liked about the movie.

It’s really an allegorical/metaphorical story about the human condition and in a narrow way, about us as Indians.

The movie depicts the high-stakes game of politics and how it brings out the worst in the characters caught in it.

It wonderfully melds some themes from the Mahabharata even … that ageless epic that contains characters with all sorts of human qualities, both good and bad.

The movie doesn’t indulge in hyperbole like the usual Bollywood movie … no over-acting.

Scenes of loss as well as levity are depicted and then the story movies swiftly on without dwelling on it for an eternity.

A movie that has a real story and a busy one.

A generational shift is depicted.

So many strong characters are depicted whose lives are all inextricably intertwined.

So many deaths take place … all, in attempts to grab power.

But, here’s the central question.

Are we any better?

Should we all watch the movie and feel smug at how much better we all are compared to these murderous politicians?

I do not think so.

I think we all behave pretty ruthlessly in our own lives. Our actions tend to be comparably brutal.

Let me explain.

We obviously do not all murder other people.

But then we are never faced with situations in our lives where the stakes are as high as shown in this movie.

We probably cheat other people to acquire more money — or, we WOULD cheat others IF we had the chance.

So also, if we had the opportunity to acquire so much power by killing someone, I think we would not hesitate to do so when we know that our actions will have NO consequences.

So, as a movie, Rajneeti has it all.

A strong storyline, wonderful cinematic portrayal, many significant characters, no improbable twists or turns in the storyline.

What more does a movie need to have?

Well, it does NOT have an uplifting message for sure.

But then, it does not seek to provide a balm.

It merely seeks to hold a mirror to the human condition and it succeeds remarkably.

Let the Oscar statuettes rain on Prakash Jha!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Longforms and 'Best of 2017' Lists and Favorite Books by Ashutosh Joglekar and Scott Aaronson

Ashutosh Joglekar's books list. http://wavefunction.fieldofscience.com/2018/03/30-favorite-books.html Scott Aaronson' list https://www.scottaaronson.com/blog/?p=3679 https://www.wired.com/story/most-read-wired-magazine-stories-2017/ https://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2017/12/the-best-books-we-read-in-2017/548912/ https://longreads.com/2017/12/21/longreads-best-of-2017-essays/ https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2017/12/21/world/asia/how-the-rohingya-escaped.html https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/how-journalists-covered-rise-mussolini-hitler-180961407/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/artificial-intelligence-future-scenarios-180968403/ https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1997/01/20/citizen-kay https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/where-we-are-hunt-cancer-vaccine-180968391/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/dna-based-attack-against-cancer-may-work-180968407/ https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/12/22/dona...

Why Do We Have A Name?

Humans across religious, cultural and national differences all have names. At least all modern humans have this. I wonder if the lost tribes in the Amazon jungle or the tribes who live in the Nicobar Islands cut off from civilization since the last many thousands of years have a similar naming convention as the rest of us humans do. And we humans often choose to have system of naming that consists of a first name and a last name. the last name often indicates a person’s or a family’s occupation and remains the same from generation to generation. All the offspring of one family get the same last name as the parents — usually the last name of the father. In some cultures, the first names can be the same as that of the father too. In some cultures, the name of the village, and other names too get added to the child’s name and it grows rather long. But consider for a moment how it all would have started and taken hold among humans in deep antiquity. Humans would have acquired...

Ayn Rand Was Right

Do we exalt the John Galts and Howard Roarks among us or despise them? Do we admire the ultimate, self-centered and selfish capitalists or the selfless, self-sacrificing altruists? Oh sure there are the Martin Luther King, Jr.s and Mahatma Gandhis and Nelson Mandelas and Aung Sun Suu Kyis we like to point to as icons and worthy role models for our children. But look deeply and we find that we are obsessed with the wealthy. And who are the wealthy? Why do we let the Robert Rubins, Sandy Weills, Jakc Welchs, Jamie Dimons and their Wall St. brethren keep their millions? Because we consider that right and their right. Let alone the hedge fund people whose entire purpose is to become billionaires. How many people explicitly make life choices that will lead to a life of service -> not be a charlatan like Mother Teresa but just helping the underprivileged without trying to 'achieve' greatness by so doing. So Lance Armstrong and Greg Mortensen and the Evangelical Christ...